81. |
Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 2006 |
|
Wójcicki Z. Postęp technologiczny i energochłonność produkcji rolniczej w Polsce
Autor | Zdzisław Wójcicki |
Tytuł | Postęp technologiczny i energochłonność produkcji rolniczej w Polsce |
Title | Technological progress and consumption of energy in the agricultural production in Poland |
Słowa kluczowe | rolnictwo, produkcja, technologia, nakłady, energochłonność, efektywność, prognozy |
Key words | agriculture, production, technology, inputs, energy consumption, effectiveness, forecast |
Abstrakt | Zaprezentowano wyniki badań i studiów prognostycznych IBMER w zakresie przemian technologicznych i ponoszonych nakładów materiałowo-energetycznych w rozwojowych gospodarstwach rodzinnych. Stwierdzono systematyczne oddziaływanie postępu naukowo-technicznego na efektywność produkcji roślinnej i zwierzęcej w ciągle zmniejszającej się liczbie towarowych gospodarstw rolniczych. Dalszy postęp technologiczny, zmniejszanie się skumulowanej energochłonności i jednostkowych kosztów produkcji rolniczej będzie stymulować utrzymywanie się około 400 tys. gospodarstw i przedsiębiorstw obrotu rolnego zdolnych do konkurowania na unijnych i światowych rynkach żywnościowych |
Abstract | Results of investigations and prognostic assessments effected by IBMER relating to both technological transformation and material as well as energy inputs in the developing family farms are presented. The results have shown a continuous impact of the scientific and technological progress on the effectiveness of plant and animal production, combined with a decreasing number of commercial family farms. The technological progress as well as decreasing cumulative energy consumption and diminishing unit costs of agricultural production are expected to stimulate the economic activity of about 400 thousand farms and agricultural enterprises capable to withstand competition in the European an world markets |
Cytowanie | Wójcicki Z. (2006) Postęp technologiczny i energochłonność produkcji rolniczej w Polsce.Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 15, z. : 95-103 |
HTML | wersja html |
Pełny tekst | PRS_2006_T15_n_s95.pdf |
|
 |
82. |
Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 2006 |
|
Dłubakowska-Puzio E., Pietraszek B. Analiza SWOT obszarów wiejskich Polski jako państwa członkowskiego Unii Europejskiej
Autor | Ewa Dłubakowska-Puzio, Beata Pietraszek |
Tytuł | Analiza SWOT obszarów wiejskich Polski jako państwa członkowskiego Unii Europejskiej |
Title | SWOT analysis of Polish rural areas in the light of Polish membership in the European Union |
Słowa kluczowe | |
Key words | SWOT analysis, Polish agriculture, European Union |
Abstrakt | |
Abstract | The presented prognosis indicates possible directions and conditions of changes that will take place in the Polish countryside within the next few years. It should be underlined that this period will encompass both positive and negative processes. During this period 2.5 billion Euros (not including money for the Common Agricultural Policy) will be devoted to the development of rural areas. Together with domestic funds, it makes a total sum of 3 billion Euros of available financial resources. Having topped these funds up with investors’ own contributions, it will be possible to deal with total financial support of 4.5 - 4.9 billion Euros per annum. This will allow us to change the image of rural areas considerably, especially the level of technical infrastructure and the quality of productive potential of agriculture, as well as agribusiness. Therefore, the countryside and farms will have many more investment opportunities at their disposal. It is predicted that these funds should first of all be devoted to creating new work opportunities in rural areas and subsequently to improve competitiveness of farms due to their progressive concentration and technical modernisation. These processes are strongly related to each other and, therefore, one should not suppose considerable regional farm concentration without providing workplaces for farmers, especially the least skilled. On the other hand, one should mention processes that will make carrying out the intentions difficult. One of them is undoubtedly further limitation of agricultural expenses, especially after year 2013 (Common Agricultural Policy included). The reform of Common Agricultural Policy that took place in 2003 assumed stabilisation of expenses on agriculture as well as their gradual reinvesting in I and II Common Agricultural Policy levels. Further changes that might take place in the subsequent period of planning (2014-2020) are not yet known, which significantly limits the possibilities of outlining aims and priorities for Poland. It should be assumed that further limitations of funds for agriculture and rural areas in general are yet to come. The above mentioned is supported by the following three reasons: - More and more popular criticism of the Common Agricultural Policy as it is shaped right now, - Funds for Common Agricultural Policy after new members with big agricultural population (Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, Turkey) would need to be increased, - Negotiations related to liberalisation of world markets within WTO. |
Cytowanie | Dłubakowska-Puzio E., Pietraszek B. (2006) Analiza SWOT obszarów wiejskich Polski jako państwa członkowskiego Unii Europejskiej .Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, t. 15, z. : 178-187 |
HTML | wersja html |
Pełny tekst | PRS_2006_T15_n_s178.pdf |
|
 |