Strefa euro a nowe kraje członkowskie Unii Europejskiej - dywergencja czy konwergencja gospodarcza?

Aldona Zawojska
Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
https://doi.org/10.22630/EIOGZ.2004.53.12
Zawojska, Aldona; ORCID: 0000-0003-3668-0127 (Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych)
Strefa euro a nowe kraje członkowskie Unii Europejskiej - dywergencja czy konwergencja gospodarcza?
Euro Zone versus new Member States of the European Union - Economic Divergence or Convergence?
Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW - Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej, 2004, vol., nr 53, s. 25-42

Abstract

Economic and Monetary Union is unique in that it combines centralised conduct of monetary policy by the European Central Bank (ECB) with national sovereignty over fiscal and other economic policies. Its main goals are providing greater macroeconomic stability and improving economic efficiency in the euro area. After implementation of the EU enlargement on l May 2004, the ten new EU member states now face the challenge of joining the Eurozone. Central and East European Countries (CEEC) differ significantly with regards to their economic performance. Of the eight countries in Central and Eastern Europe joined the EU, only Estonia and Lithuania currently meet all the Maastricht convergence criteria. EU membership gives the opportunity to catch up, but the actual economic outcomes depend on the quality of domestic policies.

Cytowania

  1. BARNIER, M. (2004): A new partnership for cohesion. Convergence, competitiveness, cooperation. Third report on economic and social cohesion, European Commission.
  2. BEUGELSDIJK, M., EIJFFINGER, S. (2003): The Effectiveness of Structural Policy in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis for the EU-15 during the Period 1995-2001, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3879.
  3. BIELECKI, J. (2004): Złoty dłużej w naszych portfelach, Rzeczpospolita, 02.10.04, Nr 232.
  4. BOROWSKI, J. (red.) (2004): Raport na temat korzyści i kosztów przystąpienia Polski do strefy euro, Wydaw. NPB.
  5. Economic Policy Committee EPC (2003): Key structural challenges in the acceding countries: the integration of the accesing countries into the Community's economic policy co-ordination processes, Brussels, 29 April.
  6. European Commission, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs (2004a): EMU after 5 years, European Economy Special Report N°1/2004.
  7. European Commission, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs (2004b): Economic forecasts. Spring 2004, European Economy N°2/2004.
  8. Europejski Bank Centralny (2004): Biuletyn miesięczny wrzesień 2004, Frankfurt.
  9. GLIGOROV, V., J. POSCHL, S. RICHTER i in. (2004): As East You Go, the More They Grow: Transition Economies in a New Setting, Research Reports, No. 308, July 2004, Wiener Institut fur Wirtschaftsvergleiche.
  10. HALLET, M. (2004): Fiscal effects of accession in the new Member States, European Economy Economic Papers No0 203 May 2004, European Commission DG for Economic and Financial Affairs.
  11. KOVACS, M.A. (2003): How real if the fear? Investigating the Balassa-Samuelson effect in CEC5 countries in the prospect of EMU enlargement, paper presented at the conference on Monetary Strategies for Accession Countries, Budapest.
  12. LEPAPE, Y., O. LOUIS (2004): PPP and EU funds, what complementarities?, Revue Elargissement Special PPP, No 45 - June 2004.
  13. LEPAPE, Y. M. LANTERI (2004): EU funds. What will be the new members' "break even point"?, Revue Elargissement No 67 - 21 June, 2004.
  14. MACIEJKO, R. (2004): BCG: koszty pracy w Polsce będą na poziomie UE za kilkadziesiąt lat, http://www.schuman.org.pl/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=3186
  15. Program konwergencji przyjęty przez Radę Ministrów w dniu 30.04.2004 r. Warszawa, kwiecień 2004 r.
  16. UNECE (2004): Economic Survey of Europe 2004 No. 2, UNECE Economic Analysis Division, Genewa.
  17. ZAWOJSKA, A. (2000): Unia Europejska. Unia Gospodarcza i Walutowa. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo SGGW.