Mechanizm zapewnienia zrównoważonego finansowania przedsiębiorstw rolnych

Nadiia Davydenko1, Yuliia Nehoda2, Iryna Tytarchuk3, Natalia Wasilewska4
1, 2, 3 Department of Finance, The National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 4 Department Economics and Management Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Faculty of Social Sciences
Davydenko, Nadiia; ORCID: 0000-0001-7469-5536 (Department of Finance, The National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)
Nehoda, Yuliia (Department of Finance, The National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)
Tytarchuk, Iryna (Department of Finance, The National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine)
Wasilewska, Natalia; ORCID: 0000-0001-8638-4735 (Department Economics and Management Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Faculty of Social Sciences)
Mechanizm zapewnienia zrównoważonego finansowania przedsiębiorstw rolnych
Roczniki Naukowe Ekonomii Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich, 2019, vol.106, nr 1, s. 7-21

Słowa kluczowe

stabilność finansowa przedsiębiorstwa rolnicze bezpieczeństwo finansowe sektor rolno-przemysłowy stabilny rozwój przedsiębiorstw rentowność

Key words

financial sustainability agricultural enterprises financial security agricultural-industrial sector stable development of enterprises profitability

JEL Classification



Celem badań jest wskazanie teoretycznych i metodycznych podejść do określania stabilności finansowej przedsiębiorstw rolnych. Przeanalizowano światowe i krajowe doświadczenia w określaniu stabilności finansowej podmiotów prowadzących działalność rolniczo-przemysłową, a także czynniki wpływające na kształtowanie stabilności finansowej na poziomie regionalnym oraz w grupach przedsiębiorstw rolnych. Istnieje specyfika mechanizmu stabilności finansowej przedsiębiorstw rolnych. Głównym celem mechanizmu zapewniającego stabilność finansową jest osiągnięcie bezpieczeństwa finansowego, stabilności funkcjonowania i rozwoju. Metoda oferuje wykorzystanie kompleksu wskaźników, które są ściśle powiązane i określają status ekonomiczny oraz zdolność finansową do kontynuowania działalności przedsiębiorstwa i badania stabilności finansowej przedsiębiorstwa.


The aim of the research is summing up and improving theoretical and methodical approaches to determination of financial sustainability of agricultural enterprises. World and national experience of financial sustainability determination of entrepreneurial activities subjects were analyzed and summarized as well as system impact factors on formation of financial sustainability on the regional level and the group of agricultural enterprises level were examined. There are considerable formation specifics of the financial sustainability mechanism of agricultural enterprises. It means that main target of mechanism to ensure financial sustainability is to achieve financial security, their work stability and development today and in future. The method offers using complex of indicators that are closely connected with each other and define economic status and financial ability to continue enterprise activities and examine financial sustainability of an enterprise. The implementation of this approach to determine financial sustainability will increase the information background for further analyzation of financial opportunities.


  1. Belyalov T., Oliynyk A. 2016: Enterprise financial stability and ways of its strengthening. International Scientific Journal “Internet Science”, Vol. 12 (22), part 2, p. 22-26.
  2. Breitschuh G., Eckert H., Matthes I., Strümpfel J., Bachmann G., Breitschuh T. Kriteriensystem Nachhaltige Landwirtschaft (KSNL). Available online: leseprobe/11466excerpt.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2018).
  3. Brentano L. 2012: Agrarian Reform in Prussia. Publ., p.78.
  4. Caldari K. 2004: Alfred Marszall’s idea of progress and sustainable development. The History of Economics Society, Vol. 4, p. 519-536.
  5. Daly H. 1996: Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development. Boston, Beacon, p. 264.
  6. Davydenko N. 2009: Financial sustainability of the corporate enterprise of agrarian sphere. Actual problems of the region’s economy development: Scientific collection of the Precarpathian National University named after. Vasyl Stefanyk. Part.2, p.110-116.
  7. Endrikata Edeltraud, J., Holger Hoppec, G. 2014: Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A metaanalytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. Eur. Manag. J., 5, p. 735-751.
  8. François Q., Kuczynski M., Meek R. L. 1972: Quesnay’s Tableau eìconomique. London, Macmillan; New York, A.M. Kelley for the Royal Economic Society and the American Economic Association.
  9. Grenz J. 2017: Response-Inducing Sustainability Evaluation (RISE); Bern University of Applied Sciences: Bern, Switzerland, p. 9.
  11. Jollands N., Lermit J. Patterson M. 2003: The Usefulness of Aggregate Indicators in Policy Making and Evaluation: A Discussion with Application to Eco-Efficiency Indicators in New Zealand. Available online: (accessed on 15 August 2018).
  12. Keynes J.M. 1936: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Macmillan Cambridge University Press, p. 263.
  13. Keynes J.M. 1973: The General Theory and After: Part I. Preparation, in the Collocted Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIII, ed D. Moggridge. Macmillan Cambridge University Press, p. 669.
  14. León Patricia 2001: Four pillars of financial sustainability. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA, p.29.
  15. Marshall Alfred 1890: Principles of Economics (8th ed.). The Online Library of Liberty, p. 627.
  16. Marx Karl 1967: Capital III International. Publishers: New York, p. 645.
  17. Mateoc-Sîrb N., Otiman P., Raicov M. 2010: Simpozion Institutul de Economie Agrară, Vol. Economie Agrară şi Dezvoltare Rurală, Editura Academiei Române, Bucureşti, ISSN 1584-5761.
  18. Mocanu N. 2012: Identification of the main directions of the agrarian sector, In: Management agricol: Simpozionul Ştiinţific Internaţional. Timişoara, vol. 14 (1), p. 127-132.
  19. Nardo Michela and others 2008: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide; OECD Publishing: Paris, France.
  20. Neumann J., Morgenstern O. 1944: Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Princeton University Press, p. 776.
  21. Parastoo S., Saudah S., Parvaneh S., Sayyedeh S., Saeidi Seyyed P., Saaeidi A. 2015: How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 2, p. 341-350.
  22. Riikkinen R., Kauppi K., Salmi A. 2017: Learning Sustainability? Absorptive capacities as drivers of sustainability in MNCs’ purchasing. Int. Bus. Rev., 26, p. 1075-1087.
  23. Scheuerlein A. 1997: Finanzmanagement für Landwirte: Beispiele, Anwendungen, Beurteilungen; BLV-Verl.-Ges.: München, Germany, p.247.
  24. 10.3390/su9091532.
    Singh P.J., Sethuraman K., Lam J.Y. 2017: Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions on Firm Value: Some Evidence from Hong Kong and China. Sustainability 9 (9), 1532.
  25. Smith A. 2008: Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Volume II. Publ. BiblioLife, p. 496.
  26. Sun W., Louche C., Pérez R. 2011: Finance and Sustainability: Towards a New Paradigm? A Post-Crisis Agenda; Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, UK, pp. 4-6, ISBN 978-1-78052-092-6.
  27. Walras L. 1984: Elements of Pure Economics, or The Theory of Social Wealth. Orion Editions, p. 620.
  28. Wasilewska Natalia, Kruchok N. 2010: Estimation of the Financial State of Agrarian Enterprises in Ukraine. „Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie. Ekonomika i Organizacja Gospodarki Żywnościowej, Vol 81, p. 41-53.
  29. 10.22630/PRS.2017.17.4.108
    Wicki, Ludwik, Mykola Orlykovskyi, Lesia Zaburanna 2017: Agriculture in Poland and Ukraine – Potential and Dynamics of Changes in Production. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 17(32) (4), s. 326-338.
  30. Young M.L. 2018: State of Sustainable Business Practices for Small and Midsized Businesses: Why Some SMEs Implement Sustainable Business Practices and Some Do Not. Available online: (accessed on 12 January 2018).
  31. Zakharchenko V. 2012: Models and methods of decision making in analysis and audit: [curriculum. manual]. Lviv: Magnolia-2006, p. 325.
  32. Zhao H., Zhang F., Kwon J. 2018: Corporate social responsibility research in international business journals: An author co-citation analysis. Int. Bus. Rev. 27, p. 389-400.
  33. Zhuravleva O. 2009: Financial stability of the enterprise: theory and practice. Formation of a market economy. Collection of scientific works. Vol. 22, p. 523-536.
  34. 10.3390/su10082942.
    Zorn A., Esteves M., Baur I., Lips M. 2018: Financial Ratios as Indicators of Economic Sustainability: A Quantitative Analysis for Swiss Dairy Farms. Sustainability, 10(8), 2942.