ADAPTATION PROCESSES OF THE AGRARIAN SECTOR FOR REALIZATION OF THE EXISITING POTENTIAL

Petro Putsenteilo1, Yuriy Klapkiv2, Viktoriia Vovk3
1 Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Management, Ternopil National Economic University, 2 Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz, 3 Institute of Economics and Management, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
https://doi.org/10.22630/ESARE.2019.3.14
Putsenteilo, Petro; ORCID: 0000-0003-0168-9316 (Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Management, Ternopil National Economic University)
Klapkiv, Yuriy; ORCID: 0000-0002-9771-5357 (Faculty of Economics and Sociology, University of Lodz)
Vovk, Viktoriia; ORCID: 0000-0002-8187-4257 (Institute of Economics and Management, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering)
ADAPTATION PROCESSES OF THE AGRARIAN SECTOR FOR REALIZATION OF THE EXISITING POTENTIAL
Economic Sciences for Agribusiness and Rural Economy, 2019, vol., nr 3, s. 112-117

Słowa kluczowe

agricultural sector adaptation processes agricultural insurance global agri-food system potential

JEL Classification

Q13 Q18

Streszczenie

The agrarian sector of Ukraine with its basic component of agriculture is increasingly becoming the systemformingfactor in the national economy. It creates the factors for maintaining the sovereignty of the state: foodand, within certain limits, the economic and ecological, energy security of the state, ensures the developmentof technologically related branches of the national economy. The main aim of the study was to compare thediversity of agrarian structure and land productivity in Ukraine. The basic commodity positions of agrarianproducts and the existing potential for development are determined. The measures necessary for the developmentof the agrarian sector of Ukraine, the expansion of markets and the successful promotion of agrarianproducts to the world food markets are singled out.

Cytowania

  1. Akram-Lodhi, A.H. (2007). Land, markets and neoliberal enclosure: an agrarian political economy perspective. Third World Quarterly, 28 (8), pp. 1437-1456.
  2. Bernstein, H. (1994). Agrarian classes in capitalist development. In: L. Sklair (ed.) Capitalism and Development. Routledge, New York, pp. 40-71.
  3. Byres, T. (1991). The agrarian question and differing forms of capitalist agrarian transition: An essay with reference to Asia. In: J. Breman, S. Mundl (eds.) Rural transformation in Asia. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 3-76.
  4. Carter, M.R., Barham, B.L. (1996). Level playing fields and laissez faire: Postliberal development strategy in inegalitarian agrarian economies. World Development, 24 (7), pp. 1133-1149.
  5. Friedmann, H. (1980). Household production and the national economy: Concepts for the analysis of Agrarian formations. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 7 (2), pp. 158-184.
  6. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1960). Economic Theory and Agrarian Economics. Oxford Economic Papers. New Series, 12 (1), pp. 1-40.
  7. Hymer, S., Resnick, S. (1969). A Model of an Agrarian Economy with Nonagricultural Activities. The American Economic Review, 59 (4), Part 1, pp. 493-506.
  8. Jones, E.L., Woolf S.J. (eds.) (2013). Agrarian Change and Economic Development. The Historical Problems. Routledge, London.
  9. Klapkiv, Y. (2016). A Strategy of institutional development in the market of insurance. Scientific bulletin of Polissia, 4 (8/1), pp. 132-136.
  10. 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-195-201
    Klapkiv, Y., Klapkiv, L., Zarudna, N. (2018). Online distribution of insurance of civil liability of owners of vehicles, the experience of Poland, opportunities of Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(1), pp. 195-201, 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-195-201
  11. 10.25140/2410-9576-2017-2-4(12)-84-91
    Klapkiv, Y., Niemczyk, L., Vakun, O. (2017). Financial mechanism of the insurance business. Scientific bulletin of Polissia, 4/2 (12), pp. 84-91, https://www.doi . org/10.25140/2410-9576-2017-2-4(12)-84-91
  12. McMichael, P. (2012). The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39 (3-4), pp. 681-701.
  13. Musgrave, W.F. (1976). Problems of change in Australian agricultural economics. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 20(3), pp. 133-143.
  14. Putsenteilo, P. (2011). Organizational economic mechanism of sustainable development provision in beef cattle breeding. Actual Problems Of Economics, 3 (117), pp. 80-86.
  15. 10.22630/ESARE.2018.1.35
    Putsenteilo, P., Klapkiv, Y., Kostetskyi, Y. (2018). Modern challenges of agrarian business in Ukraine on the way to Europe. In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Scientific Conference ‘Economic Sciences for Agribusiness and Rural Economy’, 1, pp. 250-258, 10.22630/ESARE.2018.1.35
  16. 10.1080/03066150902820412
    Razavi, S. (2009). Engendering the political economy of agrarian change. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36 (1), pp. 197-226, https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150 902820412
  17. Russi, L. (2013). Hungry capital: The financialization of food. Zero Books, Winchester.
  18. Timmer, P. (1986). Getting Process Wright. The Scope and Limit’s of Agricultural Policy. Cornell University Press, New York – Ithaca.
  19. Tomich, T.P., Kilby, P., Johnston, B.F. (1995). Transforming Agrarian Economies: Opportunities Seized, Opportunities Missed. Cornell University Press, New York – Ithaca.
  20. 10.1017/S0022050700075628
    Wright, G., Kunreuther, H. (1975). Cotton, Corn and Risk in the Nineteenth Century. The Journal of Economic History, 35 (3), pp. 526-551, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700075628